Proceedings Of The Marine

SPR 2014

Proceedings magazine is a communication tool for the Coast Guard's Marine Safety & Security Council. Each quarterly magazine focuses on a specific theme of interest to the marine industry.

Issue link: https://uscgproceedings.epubxp.com/i/284910

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 25 of 85

23 Spring 2014 Proceedings www.uscg.mil/proceedings to ensure compliance with safety and fsheries regulations that can only be monitored underway. These law enforce- ment activities contribute to important deterrent and safety regimes that conserve critical fsheries stocks and reduce the number of instances where search and rescue assistance may be required. From Stovepipes to Partnerships As the Department of Homeland Security continues to mature and increase its ability to provide for the safety and security of the nation, the Coast Guard and its sister components have found new, innovative ways to cooperate and coordinate efforts across their broad and often overlap- ping areas of responsibility to fll security gaps and elimi- nate redundancies. Gone are the days where DHS agencies expended duplicate efforts and operated largely in isolation. Now, the cooperation needed to protect the nation and facili- tate success is routine and occurs at multiple levels. Moreover, DHS components develop joint strategies and policies to establish national priorities and guide operations. Operational cooperation coalesces at joint commands such as joint operations centers, regional coordinating mecha- nisms, regional concurrence teams, air and marine opera- tions centers, and border enforcement security taskforces. These entities bring together the appropriate DHS agencies and pull in other federal, state, local, tribal, and interna- tional partners. The various DHS components have developed the means to blend their talents and agree to lead agency designations based on authorities, capabilities, and competencies. Instead of operating in a vacuum, the components operate via the Maritime Operational Threat Response process to deter- mine the lead agency, based on which one is the most logical choice. The analysis starts with authority. Leaders ask the question: All other things being equal, which agency has the clear- est and strongest authority to prosecute a case? Authorities aside, if one agency has the better capability to place a unit on the scene with the necessary capabilities to interdict a suspect, lead agency will reside there. Further, lead agency designations can and do shift as the circumstances of the case change, if it becomes apparent that a different agency is in a better position to take the lead. Moving Ahead Border safety and security is a multifaceted DHS respon- sibility that involves operations occurring throughout multiple missions, regions, domains, authorities, and envi- ronments. It is based on the need to protect the country, facilitate economic growth, and recover from disasters. Hence, cooperation and coordination among the DHS com- ponents to secure and expedite the fow of people and goods is critical to success. For the Coast Guard with its primary responsibilities in the maritime arena, this means pushing out our borders to detect, monitor, intercept, and stop threats as early as pos- sible, while protecting critical maritime infrastructure in jurisdictional waters. It also means facilitating legitimate commerce, including maintaining an effective aids to navi- gation system, keeping sea lanes open, protecting the port/ ocean interface, and quickly sorting and isolating poten- tial maritime threats from legitimate commerce. The earlier threats can be interdicted, the greater the chances of success in negatively impacting transnational criminal organiza- tions and gaining actionable intelligence leading to addi- tional tactical successes. Further, when working together effectively, tactical successes can lead to prosecutions of higher levels of criminal organizations, with the eventual effect of disrupting and dismantling them. While the Coast Guard and its DHS partners can point to many successes, not the least of which has been our ability to prevent a terrorist attack on U.S. interests in the mari- time arena, our job is far from done. DHS components must remain vigilant, connected, coordinated, forward-deployed, and positioned for action. Coast Guard assets deployed throughout ports and waterways, maritime approaches, and high seas stand a critical part of the DHS watch. The Coast Guard remains as it has stood for more than 200 years, Sem- per Paratus — always ready. About the author: Mr. Lou Orsini provides expert advice on law enforcement strategies, policies, tactics, techniques, and procedures primarily involving drug and migrant interdiction and fsheries enforcement. He ensures USCG law enforcement strategy and policy support and are consistent with relevant national and international considerations, requests, and requirements to ensure effective program management. Endnotes: 1. The White House: Department of Homeland Security. Available at http:// georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/usbudget/budget-fy2004/home- land.html. 2. American Association of Port Authorities, US Port Industry. Available at www. aapa-ports.org/Industry/content.cfm?ItemNumber=1022. 3. Ibid. 4. Strategy to Combat Transnational Organized Crime: Addressing Converging Threats to National Security. The White House, July 2011. Available at www.whitehouse.gov/ sites/default/files/microsites/2011-strategy-combat-transnational-organized- crime.pdf. 5. Fisheries Economics of the United States 2011: Economics and Sociocultural Status and Trend Series. National Marine Fisheries Service, U.S. Dept of Commerce, NOAA Tech Memo, NMFS-F/SPO-128, printed December 2012. Available at www. st.nmfs.noaa.gov/Assets/economics/documents/feus/2011/FEUS%202011%20 National%20Overview.pdf. Spring2014_FINAL.indd 23 3/21/14 11:13 AM

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of Proceedings Of The Marine - SPR 2014